In this chapter the author cites research done at Arizona State University that shows physics students, even ones who earn higher grades, failed to change their firmly-held but incorrect beliefs about the nature of motion. They found that students finished the class virtually unchanged, having learned almost nothing but what was needed to pass the test. Even in the face of direct evidence that their beliefs were mistaken; students were unlikely to question or discard those beliefs.
Bain faults the instructors, not for lacking expertise, but rather lack of awareness of how people learn. They demonstrate an inability to organize information so that it is accessible to learners. They fail to anticipate where learners will struggle, and don’t spend enough time clarifying complex concepts for the novice learners. Also they failed to tap into the intrinsic motivatioons of their students.
In response to these problems, Bain identifies some key concepts.
1. Knowledge is constructed, not received
2. Mental models change slowly
3. Questions are crucial to creating opportunities for learning and making connections
4. Caring is crucial (whether students are intrinsically motivated to learn)
I found this chapter particularly interesting, because it articulated some questions I’ve been thinking about for a long time. Namely, how do you create an environment with the right conditions for learning—and why do subject matter experts so often struggle to effectively transfer what they know to others?
My takeaway for this chapter is that, rather than dispensing answers, great teachers will create situations that make learners question their assumptions and encourage them to seek answers.
So far I love this book. Maybe too much—because I’m taking notes as I find interesting points and re-reading sections, it’s taking me longer than I’d anticipated.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey there,
ReplyDeleteI think I may need to pick up this book. I have always been interested in how people learn. I think subject matter experts may have a problem transferring knowledge, if there haven't been taught to do so. For instance, Chemistry professors are not actually professors, they are researchers, who have to teach. I think that makes a world of difference.
Wynter
"Bain faults the instructors, not for lack expertise, but rather lack of awareness of how people learn." - That's the ticket :-)
ReplyDeleteHi Wynter & Linda,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments. I've had the teacher you describe--supremely brilliant and knowledgeable--but abysmally poor at helping me understand!
I'm really interested in the secret sauce that makes the best teachers. I don't think it's a formula, I believe it has something more to do with *intentionality* if that makes any sense.
Is it about me...or the learner? What’s interesting about this subject? How open am I to learning something new?
--Patrick
Patrick. Unfortunately I have to agree with you on this one. I am assuming this study was done at the main campus. My experience there (I graduated from ASU West) was that the teachers did not maintain that healthy connection with the learners, which is imperative for the success of the learning experience, whether the learner receives an "A" or an "F". When we care about the process of learning and the change of thought processes or "meaning making" the learners will change, if not due to the content of the course, the process of learning.
ReplyDeleteThat stinks. And the more I learn about the art and science of teaching and learning the more of a disappointment that stuff is. It's easy in that situation to blame yourself and think--oh, I'm not getting it so it must be my fault.
ReplyDeleteI am so glad I bought this book - I definitely plan to read it after reading your review. Your points really hit home with me. I think this book could really be helpful. Your review has started me to reflect about how much I struggle with human interactions. I tend to find most people to be disappointing and not trustworthy. I remain safest and happiest when I do not invest too much into too many others. As I think about me being that way, I wonder why I am so fascinated with teaching! That is not a teaching personality! I have heartfelt moments where I honestly believe in the general goodness of human kind and then I revert back to cynicism, mild paranoia, and a sense of doom for humans. I envy people who can always find the good. I cannot quite feel that but I know I don't want to wallow in gloom and despair either. It is the best of times, it is the worst of times. I just don't know who I am. I cannot just talk care, I need to truly feel it. I am not good at acting. How does one really capture that right mode? Perhaps I am best to just design instruction and let others present it. Heavy reflecting going on here!
ReplyDeleteLorrie
Hi Lorrie,
ReplyDeleteI'm glad this book and discussion has kicked off this wave of reflection for you. If you've had an opportunity to read the book I'd be interested in what you thought of it.
I'm not at all surprised you got into teaching. In my view, we cynics are closet idealists. We see how things could be better, and where they're falling short of their potential. The world needs us, if only to poke the status quo.
It's great to be a happy optimist, but the world needs people who think about where to put in the emergency exits too!
--Patrick